Article, Business

How Kwapreneur Could Be the Key to Business Growth in Kwara, If Used Right

In recent years, Kwara State has taken bold steps to support economic development, especially among its youth and small business owners. Central to this effort is the Kwara State Social Investment Programme (KWASSIP), an initiative launched in 2019 with the aim of reducing poverty, empowering the vulnerable, and stimulating local enterprise. Among the many components of KWASSIP, the most prominent is Kwapreneur, a programme designed to provide financial and training support for young entrepreneurs aged 18–35. The first edition of Kwapreneur launched in 2021 and was backed by a partnership between KWASSIP and Fidelity Bank, providing interest-free loans ranging from ₦350,000 to ₦3 million, with a three-month moratorium period before repayment begins. The idea was simple and powerful: provide business-minded young people with the capital they need to either start or grow their businesses. Over 7,200 applicants applied during the first edition, out of which 170 entrepreneurs were selected based on business pitches, feasibility, and sustainability of their ideas. The top five applicants received ₦3 million each. Later editions followed, and by the time Kwapreneur 3.0 was rolled out, ₦229.5 million had been disbursed to support 490 small businesses across the state. This initiative was intended to do more than just provide funding, it was meant to transform Kwara into a hub for thriving, youth-led businesses. However, along the way, a critical challenge emerged. Despite the government’s clear intention to empower entrepreneurs and reduce poverty, a disturbing pattern began to appear: many of the beneficiaries were spending the loans on personal luxuries rather than business development. From anecdotal reports and community observations, it became evident that a number of recipients used their funds to buy expensive phones, clothes, or even organize celebrations. In some cases, funds were used to settle personal debts or handle non-business expenses. This misappropriation of funds goes directly against the purpose of the programme. These were loans, not grants, and they were expected to be repaid. But how can anyone repay a loan that was never invested to generate returns? When the money meant to grow a business is squandered, there’s no income to support repayment, and the entire cycle breaks down. This situation highlights a much deeper issue: a widespread lack of understanding about the difference between loans, grants, and personal income. A business loan is not free money. It is capital meant to be invested, with the expectation that it will produce growth, profit, and eventually, repayment. When beneficiaries fail to make this distinction, they not only put themselves at financial risk but also jeopardize the integrity and sustainability of the entire programme. If repayment rates fall, future funding becomes harder to justify, and the state may lose trust in its own empowerment strategies. Even worse, it can prevent serious, deserving entrepreneurs from accessing funds because of a lack of trust in the process. To solve this, Kwara State must take the next necessary step: mentorship. Every edition of the Kwapreneur programme going forward should be strategically tied to a structured business mentorship component. Shortlisted applicants should be trained and guided before and after disbursement. This should include practical education on: Beyond that, ongoing mentorship can help entrepreneurs identify untapped opportunities in their business ideas, improve marketing efforts, and avoid common pitfalls that plague startups. Such structured support is already being used in many successful business development programmes around the world. If Kwara adopts this model, it will not only improve loan repayment rates but also ensure that state resources are driving long-term business success, not short-term consumption. Ultimately, the impact of Kwapreneur cannot be measured by how many millions were disbursed. The true measure of success lies in how many businesses survive, how many jobs are created, and how many lives are transformed. That can only happen when entrepreneurs understand that business loans must be invested, not spent. Kwara State has done well to fund entrepreneurship. Now it must take one more step and build the mindset that drives responsible entrepreneurship. With proper mentorship and accountability, Kwapreneur can become more than a funding scheme—it can become the engine of a new business culture in the state. References: AuthorMahmood Abdullahi LokeFounder and CEO, D Creative Hub,Director, Accel360 Hub

Uncategorized

Pricing in Africa Needs a Reset: The Rise of Insight-Based Models for Informal Markets

Saleh, a 25-year-old graduate from Nairobi, desperately needed a new smartphone. He explored every option to get the best value. He came across a well-known African e-commerce brand offering a “Buy Now Pay Later (BNPL) plan, requiring a 20% upfront payment and flexible monthly instalments. The deal seemed enticing. Yet, Saleh hesitated because he didn’t want to owe anyone, no matter how little. He eventually saved for months and bought the same phone in full. Saleh’s experience reveals a prevailing issue. There is a significant mismatch between the pricing models businesses employ and the actual purchasing behaviour of their target customers in Africa. For instance, the BNPL model, imported mainly from Western markets where pricing is often built on cost-plus and margin calculations, frequently misfires. African markets, however, operate under distinct conditions, characterised by largely informal economies, a strong negotiation culture, and aspiration-driven consumers. Businesses too often develop pricing models that are detached from these contextual realities. In the relentless quest for business survival amidst economic turbulence, companies constantly face the temptation to base pricing decisions primarily on economic assumptions about the target customer, without patiently collecting insights into crucial non-economic parameters. The consequence of insufficient consumer insight is paradoxical: some businesses are more price-sensitive than their supposedly price-sensitive customers. They offer discount programs that are fundamentally misaligned with actual shopper needs. The time has come for businesses on the continent to evolve from pricing for survival to adopting insight-based pricing – a model deeply aligned with Africa’s peculiar buyer landscape. Inspired by the urgency of this task, the authors of this article embarked on an extensive insights journey to uncover the often-overlooked aspects of buyer price behaviour that are essential for crafting price models fit for Africa. Our research tools included a comprehensive customer survey of African shoppers, a focused group discussion with over 10 wholesalers, and in-depth interviews with more than 65 retailers. The findings were truly illuminating. African buyers, as our research reveals, frequently defy conventional logic when it comes to price behaviour. Businesses must grasp these nuances to bridge the gap between their pricing models and the customers they aim to serve. If Saleh’s story resonates with you, here are four overlooked considerations about buyer pricing behaviour to integrate into your insight-based pricing model: 1. Buyer’s Non-Economic Value Considerations: Beyond Affordability Affordability is not always the primary determinant of customer reaction to prices and pricing changes. Our survey revealed a striking counterpoint to the prevailing assumption of high price sensitivity: To optimise your pricing model, think beyond your buyer’s ability to afford your brand. Consider the following questions that African buyers often implicitly ask: Building your model around these additional, non-economic considerations can make all the difference. 2. Buyers’ Perception of Price Control: The Haggling Imperative African shoppers’ strong desire to control pricing situations is a grossly overlooked aspect of price modelling. On average, shoppers in our sample haggle once every week. Our research indicates that shoppers in Africa feel most in control of price in open markets (57.4%), followed by local kiosks and supermarkets (20.9%), e-commerce (17.6%), and social commerce platforms like WhatsApp (4.4%). Africans possess a deep-rooted negotiation culture, which is vividly expressed in their largely informal markets. Yet, shoppers’ feelings about price control are conspicuously absent from many existing price models. The perception that e-commerce and social commerce platforms do not allow price negotiation may partly explain why customers often trust them less than traditional open market outlets. Incorporating the haggling appetite of the target customer is a must-have in pricing models across brands and industries within the continent. 3. Buyers’ Perceived Position in Your Price Segment: Challenging Assumptions Brands that price differently by income segments (e.g., premium, mainstream, value pricing) tend to assume that low-end customers are inherently more price-sensitive than high-end customers. Our study results, however, reveal the opposite. The upper-middle-income bracket (earning $196 – $326 per month) was the most price-sensitive, while lower-income brackets (less than $45 per month) were surprisingly less price-sensitive. The findings showed that bottom-of-the-pyramid customers prioritise buying from family, friends, or trusted affiliates more than securing the best bargain. In contrast, middle-income customers often operate with more fragile budgets and greater anxiety about meeting multiple financial obligations. If you are building a pricing model for a premium brand, do not simply assume customers will be insensitive to price; instead, understand what “sensitivity” truly means to a premium customer in the African context. 4. Buyer’s Price Context: Time, Region, and Type Matter Brands must deeply understand the specific context for which they are pricing. Our study revealed significant pricing behaviour differences based on region, buyer type, and time. One of the most surprising insights from this research, particularly regarding the BNPL schemes, is the persistent and strong cultural mindset around debt-aversion and immediate ownership across African countries like Kenya and Nigeria. Instead of merely pushing the BNPL model, businesses in Africa can flip the script by initiating a “Plan Now, Buy Later” model. This approach allows customers to pay in advance for products or services they plan to need. This model empowers consumers with control, removes the stress of debt, and still supports planned purchasing behaviour. Region, timing, and buyer type are crucial contextual considerations that can make price models more flexible, adaptable, and personalised for African buyers. Africa’s informal, aspirational, and trust-based market demands a fundamentally different pricing model to cultivate sustained customer patronage and achieve market dominance. Authors Uchenna Uzo, Faculty and Academic Director, Africa Retail Academy, Lagos Business School Mahmood Abdullahi Loke, Director, Accel360 Hub Ephraim Nwokporo, Manager, Research and Partnerships, Africa Retail Academy, Lagos Business School

Scroll to Top